Child Protection Guidance 2021
Appendices: Appendix F: Resources and references 254 National Guidance for Child Protection in Scotland 2021 Version 1.0 September 2021 • NICE (2018) Therapeutic interventions after abuse and neglect. https://www.nice.org.uk/about/ nice-communities/social-care/quick-guides-for-social-care/therapeutic-interventions-after- abuse-a nd-neglect • Porter R (2018) Contact Decisions in the Children’s Hearings System. SCRA/CELCIS • Scottish Government (2020), Secure care: pathway and standards • Scottish Government/Fostering Network (2013) Managing allegations against foster carers and approved kinship carers How agencies should respond. https://www.gov.scot/publications/ managing-allegations-against-foster-carers-approved-kinship-carers-agencies-respond/ • Whincup H, Grant M, Burgess C & Biehal N (2019) Decision Making for Looked After Children in Scotland. Insights for policymakers and practitioners. University of Stirling. Stirling. https:// www.stir.ac.uk/research/public-policy-hub/policy-briefings/ • Scottish Journal of Residential Child Care: https://www.celcis.org/knowledge-bank/sircc- journal/ • Sleep Scotland https://www.sleepscotland.org/ • Social Work Scotland/CELCIS/CHS/SASW/TFN (2020): Connections for wellbeing: framework for decision-making about contact during the Covid-19 pandemic https://socialworkscotland. org/publication/connections-for-wellbeing/ Reunification/return home • Wilkins M. Farmer E. (2015a) An Evidence-Informed Framework for Return Home Practice. NSPCC/University of Bristol • Wilkins M. Farmer E. (2015b) How to Implement the Reunification Practice Framework. NSPCC/ University of Bristol • Taking Care: Practice Framework for Reunification Evaluation report. Hyde-Dryden G, Holmes L, Lawson D and Blackmore J (2015), Loughborough University Centre for Child and Family Research Preventing repeat removal • Better Care Network (2019) International Review of Parent Advocacy in Child Welfare: Strengthening Children’s Care and Protection Through Parent Participation | Better Care Network • Broadhurst, K. and Mason, C. (2017). Birth Parents and the Collateral Consequences of Court- ordered Child Removal: Towards a Comprehensive Framework. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 31 (1), pp. 41–59. https://academic.oup.com/lawfam/article/3065577/ Birth • Broadhurst K et al (2017) Vulnerable Birth Mothers and Recurrent Care Proceedings Final Summary Report. Final Main Report • International Parent Advocacy Network (2020) Parent-Advocacy-Literature-Review-.pdf • McCracken K et al (2017) Evaluation of Pause Programme. Children’s Social Care Innovation Programme Evaluation Report 49 DfE/UoCentral https://www.basw.co.uk/resources/evaluation- pause-research-report. Cost benefit analysis. https://www.pause.org.uk/why-pause/the-data/ • Mitchell M, Critchley A, (2020): Recognition Matters: the value of recognition in child care and protection. Knowledge Exchange and Impact project University of Edinburgh/Napier University/ Edinburgh Family Group Decision Making • Pause Programme: evaluation and learning: https://www.pause.org.uk/our-impact/evaluation/ • Research in Practice: recurrent care resource (2018) https://www.rip.org.uk/resources/recurrent- care/recurrent-care-section-5
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjA4NTgz